Talk:Tanking In Hit Gear - Revision history

Zaffer: Undo revision 46870 by Zaffer (talk)

2012-03-15T03:08:20Z

Undo revision 46870 by Zaffer (talk)

Zaffer: Undo revision 46871 by Zaffer (talk)

2012-03-15T03:07:13Z

Undo revision 46871 by Zaffer (talk)

Zaffer at 16:43, 11 March 2012

2012-03-11T16:43:52Z

Zaffer: /* Discussion of Edits */ new section

2012-03-11T08:55:34Z

Discussion of Edits: new section

WinterRose at 16:08, 9 March 2012

2012-03-09T16:08:12Z

Waite at 15:26, 9 March 2012

2012-03-09T15:26:05Z

Waite: Created page with "I think your math is off on this bit part: "When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement" base AC (12) + natural mo..."

2012-03-09T15:23:37Z

Created page with "I think your math is off on this bit part: "When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement" base AC (12) + natural mo..."

New page

I think your math is off on this bit part:

"When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement"

base AC (12) + natural modifier (10) + dbrill (6) = 28

2 AC runes = 15

Trading 13 AC for 10 HR/DR is still a pretty good deal, but not quite as good as you make it out to be. [[User:Waite|Waite]] 10:23, 9 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 15 March 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:

	: Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --[[User:WinterRose\|WinterRose]] 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST)		: Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --[[User:WinterRose\|WinterRose]] 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST)
−
−	~~== Discussion of Edits ==~~
−
−	~~A table is not much of a 'full-blown analysis.'~~
−
−	~~Armor optimization is not required to 'fine-tune the DR/AC aspects'~~
−
−	~~I don't see how tanking in mixed gear is the preferred way to roll as a lowhero lowhp caster.~~
−
−	~~You do not typically gain a "few hundred" AC when switching to solo gear.~~
−
−	~~Inclusion of information that can be obtained from another Wiki page makes for a tangled mess. Explanation of~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:07, 15 March 2012
Line 21:		Line 21:
	You do not typically gain a "few hundred" AC when switching to solo gear.		You do not typically gain a "few hundred" AC when switching to solo gear.

−	Inclusion of information that can be obtained from another Wiki page makes for a tangled mess.	+	Inclusion of information that can be obtained from another Wiki page makes for a tangled mess. Explanation of

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 11 March 2012
Line 21:		Line 21:
	You do not typically gain a "few hundred" AC when switching to solo gear.		You do not typically gain a "few hundred" AC when switching to solo gear.

−	Inclusion of information that can be obtained from another Wiki page makes for a tangled mess. ~~Explanation of~~	+	Inclusion of information that can be obtained from another Wiki page makes for a tangled mess.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 11 March 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:

	: Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --[[User:WinterRose\|WinterRose]] 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST)		: Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --[[User:WinterRose\|WinterRose]] 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST)
		+
		+	== Discussion of Edits ==
		+
		+	A table is not much of a 'full-blown analysis.'
		+
		+	Armor optimization is not required to 'fine-tune the DR/AC aspects'
		+
		+	I don't see how tanking in mixed gear is the preferred way to roll as a lowhero lowhp caster.
		+
		+	You do not typically gain a "few hundred" AC when switching to solo gear.
		+
		+	Inclusion of information that can be obtained from another Wiki page makes for a tangled mess. Explanation of

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 9 March 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Trading 13 AC for 10 HR/DR is still a pretty good deal, but not quite as good as you make it out to be. [[User:Waite\|Waite]] 10:23, 9 March 2012 (EST)		Trading 13 AC for 10 HR/DR is still a pretty good deal, but not quite as good as you make it out to be. [[User:Waite\|Waite]] 10:23, 9 March 2012 (EST)
		+
		+	: Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --[[User:WinterRose\|WinterRose]] 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 9 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I think your math is off on this ~~bit~~ part:	+	I think your math is off on this part:

	"When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement"		"When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement"