Talk:Gargoyles - Revision history

Rhodry at 15:15, 7 December 2011

2011-12-07T15:15:06Z

2011-12-07T07:58:39Z

2011-12-07T01:03:40Z

2011-12-07T01:01:44Z

2011-11-23T19:58:17Z

2011-11-23T18:06:54Z

2011-03-21T00:41:13Z

formatting

2011-03-21T00:40:37Z

locale

2011-03-13T07:00:24Z

1st DC

2008-08-24T06:34:07Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Average 11hp gain? that average for werre, qxl or aeth? hence I don't think we should really have this in the comments section. --[[User:Rhodry|Rhodry]] 19:01, 6 December 2011 (CST)
 : I believe he meant Werredan, but who knows. I agree, that kind of info could be well served in a separate page, a classless atheist page simply comparing hp/mana of all races to a human. Please tell me if you know this - let's assume for a moment a gargoyle war has 30% more hp than a human and -20% mana (made up numbers). Would this mean a gargoyle mage would have same difference against a human mage? Assuming atheist. If so, it would make sense to make a separate page for this and test by making only mages (to make the mana pool difference as obvious as the hp pool difference), and driving them to lvl 50 or so. Tell me how that sounds. -- [[User:WinterRose|WinterRose]] 01:58, 7 December 2011 (CST)
 ----

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Average 11hp gain? that average for werre, qxl or aeth? hence I don't think we should really have this in the comments section. --[[User:Rhodry|Rhodry]] 19:01, 6 December 2011 (CST)
 ----
 as to the part on cen and archery on the gar page, it's a little confusing the way it's stated. gar have a melee dmg mod but i don't think gar have a missile weapon dmg mod, whereas cen do have a missile weapon mod but they do not have a melee dmg mod.--[[User:3nki|3nki]] 12:06, 23 November 2011 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 7 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	Average 11hp gain? that average for werre, qxl or aeth? hence I don't think we should really have this in the comments section. --[[User:Rhodry\|Rhodry]] 19:01, 6 December 2011 (CST)
		+	----
	as to the part on cen and archery on the gar page, it's a little confusing the way it's stated. gar have a melee dmg mod but i don't think gar have a missile weapon dmg mod, whereas cen do have a missile weapon mod but they do not have a melee dmg mod.--[[User:3nki\|3nki]] 12:06, 23 November 2011 (CST)		as to the part on cen and archery on the gar page, it's a little confusing the way it's stated. gar have a melee dmg mod but i don't think gar have a missile weapon dmg mod, whereas cen do have a missile weapon mod but they do not have a melee dmg mod.--[[User:3nki\|3nki]] 12:06, 23 November 2011 (CST)

Line 49:		Line 51:

	Found Stinkin' Human in Grunkas		Found Stinkin' Human in Grunkas
−
−	~~Average 11hp gain? that average for werre, qxl or aeth? hence I don't think we should really have this in the comments section. --[[User:Rhodry\|Rhodry]] 19:01, 6 December 2011 (CST)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 7 December 2011
Line 49:		Line 49:

	Found Stinkin' Human in Grunkas		Found Stinkin' Human in Grunkas
		+
		+	Average 11hp gain? that average for werre, qxl or aeth? hence I don't think we should really have this in the comments section. --[[User:Rhodry\|Rhodry]] 19:01, 6 December 2011 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 23 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	as to the part on cen and archery on the gar page, it's a little confusing the way it's stated. gar have a melee dmg mod but i don't think gar have a missile weapon dmg mod, whereas cen do have a missile weapon mod but they do not have a melee dmg mod.--[[User:3nki\|3nki]] 12:06, 23 November 2011 (CST)		as to the part on cen and archery on the gar page, it's a little confusing the way it's stated. gar have a melee dmg mod but i don't think gar have a missile weapon dmg mod, whereas cen do have a missile weapon mod but they do not have a melee dmg mod.--[[User:3nki\|3nki]] 12:06, 23 November 2011 (CST)
		+
		+	: The idea was that if you wish to play a high-TNL archer, centaur is a far better choice. In fact, mostly anyhting else was a better choice. But since they do not receive an archery mod, this is at least easy to fix. -- [[User:WinterRose\|WinterRose]] 13:58, 23 November 2011 (CST)

	Gargoyles do make good mages/sor but they still fail spells at 97%		Gargoyles do make good mages/sor but they still fail spells at 97%

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 23 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	as to the part on cen and archery on the gar page, it's a little confusing the way it's stated. gar have a melee dmg mod but i don't think gar have a missile weapon dmg mod, whereas cen do have a missile weapon mod but they do not have a melee dmg mod.--[[User:3nki\|3nki]] 12:06, 23 November 2011 (CST)
		+
	Gargoyles do make good mages/sor but they still fail spells at 97%		Gargoyles do make good mages/sor but they still fail spells at 97%
	-Rhodie		-Rhodie

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 The Midgaard Beastmaster exclaims 'You.  Follow me and see!'
 The Midgaard Beastmaster beckons for you to follow him.
 fol mid
 You now follow The Midgaard Beastmaster.
 The Midgaard Beastmaster roars loudly! GRRAAARRRR!!
 The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Whip.  It was stolen.'
 The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Human.  Stole my whip.'
 The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'You.  Can get it back.'
 The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'You.  Will look near trees.  Big trees.'
 The Midgaard Beastmaster nods at himself.  Is he senile?
 The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Whip.  Bring to Guard.'
 The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Bring Token. Guard.'
 The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Do not. Disappoint me.'
 The Midgaard Beastmaster stares straight at you. You feel a little nervous.
 Found Stinkin' Human in Grunkas

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 13 March 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Hmm, that is bizarre. I suppose it's always possible that I was just lucky at 97%. I'm now at 100% on torment, but I'll check later to see if I have anything else at 97% that I can test out a bit. - Jimi		Hmm, that is bizarre. I suppose it's always possible that I was just lucky at 97%. I'm now at 100% on torment, but I'll check later to see if I have anything else at 97% that I can test out a bit. - Jimi
		+
		+
		+	----------
		+
		+	DC
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster exclaims 'You. Follow me and see!'
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster beckons for you to follow him.
		+
		+
		+	fol mid
		+	You now follow The Midgaard Beastmaster.
		+
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster roars loudly! GRRAAARRRR!!
		+
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Whip. It was stolen.'
		+
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Human. Stole my whip.'
		+
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'You. Can get it back.'
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'You. Will look near trees. Big trees.'
		+
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster nods at himself. Is he senile?
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Whip. Bring to Guard.'
		+
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Bring Token. Guard.'
		+
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster says 'Do not. Disappoint me.'
		+
		+
		+
		+	The Midgaard Beastmaster stares straight at you. You feel a little nervous.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 As far as I can tell, gargoyle is as close to no-fail as you can get at 97% for arcane.  I haven't failed torment on my Gar Sor in close to 80 levels.  Non-arcane spells though, yeah I spell a bit. - Jimi
-Make that 240 levels of nofail on torment at 97%.  That is for arcane only of course, non-arcane they can still fail at 97%.
+Make that 240 levels of nofail on torment at 97%.  That is for arcane only of course, non-arcane they can still fail at 97%. - Jimi
 Odd, my gar mag shz still fails at 97%-Rhodie
 Hmm, that is bizarre.  I suppose it's always possible that I was just lucky at 97%.  I'm now at 100% on torment, but I'll check later to see if I have anything else at 97% that I can test out a bit. - Jimi